First Presidential Debate Goes to Romney

by James Buchanan

First of all, there’s always a chorus of “why should we care?” when it comes to two-party elections. Obama is a hustler from the bowels of the corrupt Chicago political machine while Romney is an overly liberal Republican, whom conservatives don’t like. There are three big issues in 2012: The economy, a possible war on Iran and whether or not 20 million illegal aliens become US citizens. It’s fairly obvious that the economy is the 800lb gorilla in the room and that issue alone –if Romney has enough brains to stay focused on it– will decide the election.



In regards to a possible war on Iran, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports “A senior government official told Haaretz that even if Jerusalem attacks Iran over Washington’s objections, he doesn’t think the United States will turn its back on Israel. Israel, he added, must retain sole responsibility for its security…. Netanyahu, meanwhile, said on Tuesday that ‘things that affect our fate, our very existence, we don’t entrust to others – not even to our best friends. Obama and Romney both said that Israel has the right to defend itself against any threat, and we are obligated to make the decisions.’”

This strongly suggests that Israel is prepared to attack Iran regardless of who is in the White House.

The other big issue is immigration and whether or not 20 million illegal aliens get an Amnesty. Obama has already handed out a partial “Dream Act” Amnesty –acting without Congress. As if that isn’t an ominous enough sign, anyone, who compares Obama’s position on immigration with Romney’s position on immigration as noted on their respective websites will quickly see that Obama is strongly in favor of giving US citizenship to illegal aliens inside the US while Romney opposes an Amnesty.

The United States cannot afford to have 20 million illegal aliens “amnestied”. We are getting perilously close to a non-White majority. The White population is only about 66 percent of the US and falling. We can’t afford to fast-forward the process of turning America non-White. If Barack Obama gets a second term, he will grant an Amnesty for 20 million illegals and combine that with a chain-migration provision, allowing the extended families of the amnestied illegal aliens to come to the US, which potentially could drop the White percentage of the US to below 50 percent in just a few years —much faster than anyone else has predicted up to now.
Now that the “irrelevancy issue” has been addressed, it appears Romney has won the first presidential debate decisively!

A recent article at CNN reports “Sixty-seven percent of registered voters who watched the debate said GOP nominee Mitt Romney won the debate, while 25% said President Barack Obama came out as the winner, according to a CNN/ORC International Poll released late Wednesday night.”

“For the survey, 430 adult Americans were interviewed by telephone after the end of the debate. The poll does not and cannot reflect the views of all Americans. It only represents the views of people who watched the event.”

It looks like CNN’s post-debate poll hit pretty close to the mark. Most media pundits were amazed at how well Romney did and how Obama seemed to be practically “phoning it in”. At several points in the debate Obama appeared to be getting help from Lehrer finishing thoughts so that they came out coherent.

Most Romney supporters were afraid that Mitt’s lack of charisma would allow Obama to run circles around him, but Obama appeared to be in as bad a shape as the economy while Romney seemed full of enthusiasm.

The biggest thing looming over the debates and the presidential contest is the terrible state of the economy. At the Democrat National Convention, the best Obama could come up with was to ask Americans to give him more time. More time to do what? Wallow in Depression-level unemployment?

All Romney has to do to win is keep the focus on the economy. While talking about government subsidies, Romney scored a great line during the debate when he noted “you (Obama) put $90 billion, like 50 years worth of (tax) breaks into solar and wind… to Solyndra and Fisker and Tesler and I had a friend who said you don’t just pick the winners and losers, you pick the losers.” The Solyndra fiasco alone ultimately cost taxpayers $525 million.

2000th US Military Death in Afghanistan’s Endless, Pointless War

by Jeff Davis

The US military just suffered its 2000th death in Afghanistan. Even if you believe the government’s narrative about 911, then shouldn’t we have declared “victory” with the death of Osama bin Laden in April, 2011 and pulled out? Why did we stay in Afghanistan only to lose a good portion of Seal Team Six in a helicopter crash, not to mention hundreds of other Americans killed for no clear reason?



A recent news article reports: “It was another week at war in Afghanistan, another string of American casualties, and another collective shrug by a nation weary of a faraway conflict whose hallmark is its grinding inconclusiveness. After nearly 11 years, many by now have grown numb to the sting of losing soldiers like Pfc. Shane W. Cantu of Corunna, Mich. He died of shrapnel wounds in the remoteness of eastern Afghanistan…”

“Nearly every day the Pentagon posts another formulaic death notice, each one brief and unadorned, revealing the barest of facts – name, age and military unit – but no words that might capture the meaning of the loss. Cantu, who joined the Italy-based 173rd Airborne Brigade on Sept. 11 last year and went to Afghanistan last month, was among five U.S. deaths announced this past week, as the Democrats and Republicans wrapped up back-to-back presidential nominating conventions.”

America has no draft for fear of the anti-draft movement of the 1960s making a come back. Apparently, it’s “OK” for some poor 18 year old, who can’t find a job in the MidWest to be forced to “volunteer” for the Army and to die in a pointless war, but it’s not OK for the son of a rich man to be drafted to fight for his country.

The article continues “American troops are still dying in Afghanistan at a pace that doesn’t often register beyond their hometowns. So far this year, it’s 31 a month on average, or one per day. National attention is drawn, briefly, to grim and arbitrary milestones such as the 1,000th and 2,000th war deaths. But days, weeks and months pass with little focus by the general public or its political leaders on the individuals behind the statistics. Each week at war has a certain sameness for those not fighting it, yet every week brings distinct pain and sorrow to the families who learn that their son or daughter, brother or sister, father or mother was killed or wounded.”

“As the war drags on, it remains a faraway puzzle for many Americans. Max Boot, a military historian and defense analyst at the Council on Foreign Relations, has called Afghanistan the ‘Who Cares?’ war. ‘Few, it seems, do, except for service personnel and their families,’ he wrote recently. ‘It is almost as if the war isn’t happening at all.’”

Which of course is the way the liberal media wants it. They don’t want to have to explain why Obama with his Nobel Peace Prize is taking so long to withdraw US troops.

Most likely we’re staying in Afghanistan so that the CIA can make a healthy profit off the poppy fields and the drug-trafficking, which the Taliban had earlier closed down. There were rumors of the CIA profiting off the drug trade in southeast Asia during the Vietnam War and off the drug traffic flowing through Central America.

There are reports of massive natural resources that have been found in Afghanistan, which some US corporations no doubt would like to steal. And don’t forget that multi-billion dollar natural gas pipeline project back in 2001, which the Taliban had awarded to Bridas Oil of Argenetina. Some people have speculated that the war on Afghanistan was really just a retaliation against the Afghans for not choosing Unocal.

Fifteen of the nineteen hijackers on 911 came from Saudi Arabia. None of them came from Afghanistan. The Taliban government offered to help the US hunt down al Qaeda if George Bush would show them the evidence that al Qaeda was responsible for the 911 attack. Bush chose instead to start bombing Afghanistan. You don’t suppose Afghanistan’s position on the eastern border of Iran was yet another reason why we’re still in that country –as a possible staging base for a future attack on Iran. We’ve been fed a lot of lies about 911. You might want to check out the videos below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_IZaUuK_d0

Democrat Politician Caught Having Sex with 17 Year Old at Rest Stop

by Jeff Davis

An article on Godfatherpolitics.com reports: “With all of the sex scandals that have rocked the political world in the past few years, it’s a wonder that most of us haven’t heard about this one. But then again, it may have been snuffed by the liberal press since it involved a homosexual.”


State Representative Kerry Gauthier

“According to a report out of Minnesota, State Representative Kerry Gauthier is being investigated by Duluth police for engaging in sodomy with a 17 year old boy at a public rest stop.”

“A witness to the act approached a state patrolman around 11pm to report the indecent behavior at the Thompson Hill rest stop on July 22.Gauthier, an openly gay Democrat, represents Minnesota’s 7B Congressional district which encompasses the southern edge of Duluth and extends south along Saint Louis Bay located at the southern tip of Lake Superior where Minnesota and Wisconsin meet.”

“Believe it or not, there are unofficial reports indicating that Gauthier will not face any criminal charges since the sex was considered to be consensual and Minnesota’s age of consent is 16. Evidently there will be no charges filed for public indecency either since none were mentioned.”

What about the unfortunate individual, who walked in on them? Doesn’t he have the right to use a restroom without being traumatized by perverts using that public facility for deviant sex? Aren’t there laws against people having sex in public? Or are the authorities refusing to enforce those laws against Mr. Gauthier?

This isn’t the first homosexual politician to be caught having sex in a public restroom. The governor of New Jersey, Jim McGreevey made a public confession that he had been having sex at rest stops and then there’s the famous case of the still closeted ex-Senator Larry Craig, who was caught soliciting sex from an undercover vice officer in the next stall at an airport restroom.

Up until 1973, the American Psychiatric Association ruled that homosexuality was a form of mental illness. Was the decision to change that ruling legitimate or was it changed due to pressure from activist organizations?

An article from the Conservative Colloquium notes “In 1970, psychiatrists generally considered sexual desires toward members of one’s own gender to be disordered….”

“Led by radicals like Frank Kameny, same-gender sex activists attacked many psychiatrists publicly, as Newsweek describes, “But even more than the government, it is the psychiatrists who have experienced the full rage of the homosexual activists. Over the past two years, gay-lib organizations have repeatedly disrupted medical meetings, and three months ago—in the movements most aggressive demonstration so far—a group of 30 militants broke into a meeting of the American Psychiatric Association in Washington, where they turned the staid proceedings into near chaos for twenty minutes. ‘We are here to denounce your authority to call us sick or mentally disordered,’ shouted the group’s leader, Dr. Franklin Kameny, while the 2,000 shocked psychiatrists looked on in disbelief. ‘For us, as homosexuals, your profession is the enemy incarnate. We demand that psychiatrists treat us as human beings, not as patients to be cured!’” (Newsweek, 8-23-71, p.47)

“Ironically, at the very moment Franklin Kameny was claiming that same-gender sex was healthy, safe, and natural, a deadly virus was silently passing through communities of men all over the nation as a result of the promiscuous, unhealthy nature of the sex they were having. Only a decade later, thousands of men would be dead or dying, of AIDS.”

“….After the vote by the American Psychiatric Associations Board of Trustees, some members of the APA, led by Dr. Charles Socarides called for a full vote by the APA’s 17,905 members. (The Long Road to Freedom, ed. by Mark Thompsan1994, p. 104)”

“On April 9, 1974, results of the vote were announced. Only 10,555 of the 17,905 APA members had voted in the election. The results were as follows,
Total APA members eligible to vote: 17,905
Number of APA members that actually voted: 10,555
Number of members that “Abstained”: 367
Number of “ No” votes-votes to keep “homosexuality” in the DSM as a mental disorder: 3,810
Number of “Yes” votes-votes to remove “homosexuality” from the DSM as a mental disorder: 5,854"

"It should be noted that the number of “Yes” (5,854) made up only 32.7 percent of the total membership of the APA. Only slightly less than one-third of the APA’s membership approved the change.”

Did the FBI step in to protect psychiatrists from this terrorism? NO. The FBI did however step in to protect abortion doctors whenever they felt threatened by militant Christians. I guess who gets police protection in the US depends on how politically correct you are. If you’re not politically correct, the police stand back and let the radicals attack you and break up your meetings.

In other words, homosexual activists terrorized the American Psychiatric Association into changing its stand. Under immense pressure, less than one third of the APA voted to change the ruling on homosexuals, which raises the question: Did the APA really change the ruling or were we just told that they did?

The Zionist-controlled media also played a key role in defending and promoting homosexuality as if it were a normal “alternative lifestyle” as opposed to a mental disorder that sometimes results in grown men, including politicians, having sex in public restrooms, despite the insanity of such behavior in terms of their careers. But then, these men are “sane” according to the Ziomedia and any criticism of them is supposedly “homophobic”.

Anti-Obama Movie: Sleeper Hit of 2012

by Jeff Davis

One of the greatest suppressed news stories of the 2012 election is the success of an anti-Obama documentary movie, “2016 Obama’s America” which started out in just a few theaters and eventually aired in over 2,000. The movie has been a sort of “sleeper hit” slowly building up profits with very little advertising and mostly word-of-mouth helping it along. The movie has pulled in $32 million so far, which is very impressive for a low budget documentary, but as far as the liberal media is concerned, the film doesn’t exist. If the movie had been anti-Romney, the director would be appearing on all the late-night talk shows and the free publicity from Hollywood would be worth millions.


Barry Soetoro

An article from August in the Washington Examiner reports: “Surging popularity in the anti-Obama movie 2016: Obama’s America has dramatically boosted the number of theaters showing it, making the film the second biggest money-maker per-theater behind the The Expendables 2, the nation’s No. 1 flick. Having opened last month in just a single Texas theater and facing complaints from the president’s supporters, 2016: Obama’s America was shown in 169 theaters last weekend and is slated to be in 800 this weekend, producers tell Secrets.”

“Just as shocking: Over the weekend it earned $7,391 per theater, topping huge hits like The Dark Knight Rises [Batman], The Bourne Legacy, and The Campaign. Last weekend, it earned $1,249,000, a 293 percent one-week surge. Expendables 2 earned $8,670 per theater, tops in the country. What’s more, it was the 13th overall money-maker last week, following a movie that was showing in over 1,100 theaters.”

“2016: Obama’s America is based on the conservative author Dinesh D’Souza’s book The Roots of Obama’s Rage, and suggests that the president wants to downsize the influence of the United States. Producer John Sullivan told Secrets that it is popular because ‘people are looking for a different narrative on Obama than they are getting from the mainstream media.’”

They’re looking for the truth, in other words.

The article goes on “Sullivan added that the movie isn’t just doing well in conservative markets. He said that the highest-grossing showings have been in Manhattan and Los Angeles. The timing of the movie’s expansion and popularity isn’t good for the president, though critics have suggested that it is preaching to those already opposed to Obama.”

A lot of Americans know almost nothing about Barack Obama aside from the sanitized mainstream media propaganda. There could easily be a large number of moderates going to the movie, just to educate themselves about Obama, and they’ll be in for a shock. If a movie can influence just a few million people to get out and vote in November, this country might yet have a chance to get rid of a president who has been nothing short of catastrophic for America.

The movie is apparently not available yet in DVD or for download yet, but more information can be found here.

The Obama Economy: Solyndra and the Volt

by Jeff Davis

We’re hearing a lot of propaganda from the Obama regime about how he has all sorts of ideas to help the economy if we would just give him another four years. Well, why don’t we look at what Obama has done during his first years in office? Obama heavily invested taxpayer dollars in Solyndra, which turned into a half billion dollar failure. Looks like another one of the Obama administration’s much-touted “alternate energy” projects, the Volt has run out of juice too.


$535 million govt. loan to Solyndra all lost.

USA Today reports: “General Motors is halting, for a month, the manufacture of its well-known but seldom-sold Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric car, according to trade publication Automotive News. It would be the second interruption in production for the Volt, which can go 38 miles on battery power before needing a recharge from its gasoline engine or via a plug-in.”

Basically, the Volt is a glorified golf cart with a small gas engine to keep it from being completely worthless. 38 miles is nothing in American driving distances. Maybe one trip to the mall and back. Many Americans are forced to drive for hours each day in their daily commutes to work. During the summer, you often need to run the car’s air conditioner continuously, which is something that a Volt would quickly need its gas engine to do. During the winter, you will probably need to run the gas engine to get heat so that the inside of the Volt isn’t freezing.

USA Today goes on: “Automotive News citing unnamed sources, reports the Detroit-Hamtramck plant from Sept. 17 until Oct. 15. Leaders of the United Auto Workers union told the plant’s 1,500 workers about the scheduled downtime last week, the source said.”

“A GM spokesman declined comment. ‘We don’t comment on production schedules,’ the spokesman told the News. ‘We continue to match supply and demand.’”

So, in other words, there is no demand, hence the hiatus in production. The Toyota Prius has been around for years and has most of the bugs out of it as far as a practical hybrid goes. It’s still way too expensive for ordinary Americans to buy (especially in the current Obama Depression). The Prius is a status car for rich suburban Whites, who want to pretend that they’re environmentally conscious.

The article notes “GM sold 10,666 Volts through July, way up from the 2,870 sold during the same period a year earlier.”

That’s roughly 13,000 of these golf carts in a nation of 300 million people, with how many new and used cars sold every year? They’re also incredibly expensive, by the way. They ran abut $60,000 new when they first came out, although now what with assorted deals and trade-ins and rebates and gimmicks you can pick one up for about $40,000. Or you can pick yourself up a new Hyundai starting at about $14k or a used car for about $5k.

The reason for the hiatus in the Volt’s production is simple: Almost nobody in America except a handful of rich liberals wants the thing. And even rich liberals are a little choosy about what they buy in this bad economy. Most rich green yuppies already have a Prius and will probably just keep driving that since Toyota has gotten the bugs out of their design and Toyota will still be around years from now making spare parts.

Newsweek Has Anti-Obama Cover, Gets Big Jump in Sales

by Jeff Davis

Most Americans gave up on Newsweek as yet another biased arm of the mainstream media decades ago. In a stunning surprise move, Newsweek has run an article on its cover highly critical of Barack Obama. Adage.com notes “The early read on sales suggests the issue could double Newsweek’s newsstand average, MagNet said. It’s also on track to land among the title’s top three newsstand sellers since 2010, according to MagNet data.” Obviously, people are more willing to buy a magazine when they see something they agree with on the cover and a lot of Americans wanted to read the anti-Obama story on Newsweek’s cover.



The article by Niall Ferguson reports “In his inaugural address, Obama promised ‘not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth.’ He promised to ‘build the roads and bridges, the electric grids, and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together.’ He promised to ‘restore science to its rightful place and wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost.’ And he promised to ‘transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age.’ Unfortunately the president’s scorecard on every single one of those bold pledges is pitiful…”

“[T]he total number of private-sector jobs is still 4.3 million below the January 2008 peak. Meanwhile, since 2008, a staggering 3.6 million Americans have been added to Social Security’s disability insurance program. This is one of many ways unemployment is being concealed.”

“In his fiscal year 2010 budget—the first he presented—the president envisaged growth of 3.2 percent in 2010, 4.0 percent in 2011, 4.6 percent in 2012. The actual numbers were 2.4 percent in 2010 and 1.8 percent in 2011; few forecasters now expect it to be much above 2.3 percent this year.”

“Unemployment was supposed to be 6 percent by now. It has averaged 8.2 percent this year so far. Meanwhile real median annual household income has dropped more than 5 percent since June 2009. Nearly 110 million individuals received a welfare benefit in 2011, mostly Medicaid or food stamps.”

Ferguson is doing the one thing that Obama supporters can’t deal with. He’s actually listing Obama’s promises and failures one by one. Most Americans know the economy is in a severe slump, but a stark listing of his goals and his failures is truly overwhelming.

Obama promised to promote science, but he has presided over the down-sizing of NASA, which is the most visible science program sponsored by the US. The Shuttle fleet was retired in 2011 and American astronauts can only get to the International space station on Russian rockets. Shortly before he died, Neil Armstrong referred to Obama’s plan for NASA as “devastating”.

Barack Obama has mightily upset his liberal base by refusing to deliver a European-style social welfare state on a platter, which is what was expected of him, and also through his incompetence which has become so obvious as to be embarrassing, including one incident where he was literally unable to address a class of third graders without a teleprompter.

It is possible that Obama may lose enough of his base due to liberal and moderate disenchantment with him to put Romney over the top in November—assuming that the votes are counted honestly. This wouldn’t be the first time that a Black was hired and then months down the road, “quota-hire fatigue” sets in as the management realizes that the number of mistakes and blunders are just too many to ignore and that the company needs to find a replacement, who is able to do the job.

The Democrat War on Women

by Jeff Davis

The Democrat party regularly accuses the Republicans of waging a so-called “war on women”, which is really ironic coming from the party of Bill Clinton. Breitbart.com reports “Clinton’s brutal history of abusing and ostensibly raping women marks him as the worst kind of sexual predator – the kind who uses his position of power to force women to capitulate and then threaten them into silence. There have been countless voluminous reports of Clinton’s lechery for decades, but some are better known than others. Juanita Broaddrick’s violent rape by Clinton in 1978 when he was the attorney general of Arkansas was the first case chronologically to go public. When she finally told her story to NBC’s Lisa Myers 21 years later, NBC shelved the interview because of pressure from the White House.” Equally alarming are additional stories of rape and sexual assault by Bill Clinton, some of which can be found here.


Democrats accused of rape: Donny Ray Williams Jr. and Bill Clinton

The Weekly Standard reports: “A former Democratic staffer on Capitol Hill who worked in the Obama administration has been accused of drugging and sexually assaulting women. A former senior congressional aide was indicted this week in D.C. Superior Court on charges that he sexually assaulted two women after drugging them with a sedative that he allegedly put in their drinks.”

“Donny Ray Williams Jr., 36, who served as staff director for a Senate subcommittee and worked in the offices of several members of Congress, gave at least one woman Ambien and assaulted her while she was unconscious, according to court papers. Williams was charged with 10 counts of first- and second-degree sexual abuse and related charges in connection with attacks that authorities said occurred between July and December 2010. During that time, according to his profile on the LinkedIn Web site, Williams was staff director of a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee.”

Homeland Security, eh? Right where we want a rapist. I’m surprised he didn’t take a job with the TSA.

The Weekly Standard goes on: “A third woman made similar allegations against Williams, attorneys and Williams said, and a fourth woman said that he threatened her. As a result of that fourth allegation, Williams was indicted on one count of threatening to injure or kidnap a person. Additional details of that charge were not made public. And though the Washington Post story fails to mention it: the staffer has worked only for Democrats, including: Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, Rep. Jan Schakowskay of Illinois, Senator Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, and Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, among others.”

The Democrats do not practice what they preach. Not only are there sexual assaults by top Democrats, the Democrats are the first to use sexist “airhead” stereotypes against their political opponents. Look at the hatchet jobs they did against Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin. The Democrats accuse others of the very faults and weaknesses that key people in their ranks are guilty of.

Akin Still Running for Senate; Poll Shows Close Race

by Jeff Davis

It could be that the times are changing in America, and in a country in a desperate economic strait, people simply no longer care what the Zionist-controlled mainstream media tells them to think. The Ziomedia loudly announced that Akin was “finished” after he made one odd comment about abortion.


Todd Akin

An article in the Washington Times reports: “Despite widespread assertions that Missouri Republican Rep. W. Todd Akin’s abortion remarks have made him a heavy underdog in the state’s U.S. Senate race, a Democratic-leaning polling firm released a poll Thursday showing him in a virtual dead heat with incumbent Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill. According to the survey by Public Policy Polling, Mrs. McCaskill has support from 45 percent of likely Missouri voters compared with 44 percent for Mr. Akin, a result that differs strongly from polls conducted last week by other firms.”

Keep in mind is that many Americans, especially those of European heritage, sometimes do not answer poll questions honestly, because having grown up in a politically correct society, some people worry that being conservative or pro-Christian might hurt their careers. Most people like that in Hollywood for example stay deeply in the closet.

The Washington Times goes on: “Mr. Akin has been widely condemned by Democrats and Republicans since he made comments in an Aug. 19 television interview, in which he tried to explain his opposition to abortion for rape victims by saying that pregnancy is rare in cases of ‘legitimate rape.’”

It’s not clear what exactly Mr. Akin meant, and he made a poor choice of words. Let’s assume that by “legitimate rape,” he meant violent, non-consensual rape, instead of statutory rape. In the US, consensual sex with someone under the age of consent is considered "statutory rape". This is probably the distinction that Mr. Akin was trying to make, but the Ziomedia prefers to just demonize him rather than give him the benefit of the doubt.

It appears that Mr. Akin thinks that there is some biological response to violent, non-consensual rape to prevent pregnancy. There is actually a myth in existence that this is the case, but data collected on rapes suggests that five percent of rapes result in pregnancy, which is far from “rare” so this myth that Mr. Akin apparently believed in is apparently wrong.

There are plenty of myths, urban legends and superstitions that people believe in. I don’t think finding out a candidate believed in one incorrect myth is grounds for not voting for him.

If people do want to judge a candidate by his gaffes, one source notes Barack Obama once said “Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.”

Now what’s worse, someone, who believes an odd medical myth, or the fact that a candidate was raised in Indonesia and who has so little attachment to America that he doesn’t even know how many states there are –something that every American child would know? The Ziomedia gave Obama a pass for his failure to know how many states are in the US.

Other quotes from Obama include the two quotes below:

“There are White folks and there are ignorant mother f–kers like you.” (Source)

“You go into these small towns… And it’s not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” (Source)

The attack on Mr. Akin by the Ziomedia doesn’t seem to have done him much harm, at least not as much harm as it would have done, say, four years ago. Americans are now more concerned about their own and their children’s future in a nation in decline than they are about some political molehill that the Ziomedia is trying to turn into a mountain.

The Zionists want a “one strike you’re out” policy for Tea Party Republican candidates while someone like Barack Obama apparently can make one horrific statement after another and still be considered a serious candidate and not a bitter, angry Marxist, who has nothing in common with ordinary Americans.

Black Teacher Helped her Students Cheat "because they’re dumb as hell"

by Jeff Davis

It is a statistical fact that Black students score 15 IQ points lower on average than White students. This IQ gap has persisted for over 100 years and despite the best efforts of democracies including magnet schools, busing, ad nauseam, nothing seems to be able to change this. Add to this, the fact that Whites have a brain size 80cc larger than Blacks on average. The average White brain size is 1347. The largest brain size of an ape on record is 700cc.


Shayla Smith

While it may seem “harsh” to point out these facts, maybe western democracies need to realize that you can’t expect different races to have the same exact abilities. Perhaps, expectations need to be adjusted to correspond to each group’s inherent ability.
CBS Atlanta reports: “A former fifth-grade teacher implicated in a cheating scandal reportedly gave students the illegal assistance because she thought they were ‘dumb as hell.’ According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, math teacher Shayla Smith was accused of offering students the answers to a test they were taking at the time. She had reportedly been responsible for supervising them while the tests were being completed.”

“Schajuan Jones, who taught a fourth-grade class across the hall from Smith’s former room, overheard her talking to another teacher about the test. ‘The words were, 'I had to give your kids, or your students, the answers because they’re dumb as hell,' Jones was quoted as saying about the interaction between Smith and the unidentified third teacher. A former student also allegedly accused Smith of cheating, adding that the educator offered the girl, now in eighth grade, the answers to a math test in 2010."

“The tribunal deliberated for just one hour before handing down a guilty verdict. Smith had been charged with willful neglect and immorality, and she subsequently lost her job. Smith’s case was part of a larger investigation that implicated approximately 180 public school teachers in the city, sparked by investigations performed by the newspaper. All tests proctored by Smith were allegedly marked with suspicious erasure marks, amounting to what was termed a “practically impossible frequency of changes from wrong to right [answers].”

The Atlanta school system is one of the worst in the country, and it also contains one of the largest percentage of Blacks in the country. About a year ago there was a major scandal in the Atlanta school system when a number of teachers and several school principals were caught conducting massive test score fraud to bring the school system up to standard so no federal tax money was lost. The story has since disappeared from the mainstream news media, so it is unclear what if anything was ever done about it.

Medical Doctors Fleeing Britain

by Jeff Davis

An article in The Financial Times reports: “The National Health Service is suffering a brain drain of doctors as more medics trained at taxpayers’ expense choose to pursue their careers overseas, according to Financial Times research. Most go to Australia or New Zealand, say recruiters and doctors’ organisations, and data suggest more now choose to stay longer or settle permanently.”



It’s an easy choice for a medical doctor whether or not to work in a socialist state, where politicians dictate how much can be earned. Who wants to spend ten years to become an M.D. if your salary is limited and working conditions dictated to you?
The Financial Times goes on “Tracking the numbers of medical professionals leaving and returning to the UK is difficult because neither the government nor health industry bodies record that information. However, the number of certificates of good standing – which the UK’s General Medical Council issues at a doctor’s request and are necessary to take up a post in another country – has risen steadily since records began in 2008. Since then, more than 8,000 people have requested such certificates for Australia and New Zealand alone.”

“Additionally, the number of Australian permanent visas issued to UK-trained doctors has almost tripled during the past five years, with 645 granted in 2010-11, according to immigration data. But the lure of an improved lifestyle and better weather, along with higher pay, shorter hours and superior arrangements for professional study, are not the only reasons many are opting for a life abroad. Many of the young medics have failed to secure jobs in the UK because there are more places in medical schools than jobs available and they are not sufficiently experienced to practise privately.”

I thought the British National Health Service was screaming for doctors and weeping and moaning because they were all fleeing the country to private practice where they can make huge amounts of money. If the government dictates salaries and working conditions for doctors, do they also dictate that a certain percentage of doctors should be unemployed? Perhaps, Britain no longer has the resources to pay enough doctors to take care of the native British population as well as the millions of foreigners, most of them Third World poor, who have recently immigrated.

The article notes “‘In the last few years we’ve seen a general increase in the number of doctors and health professionals from the UK, particularly from Ireland for nursing, particularly from England for doctors,’ said Alan Bell, of the Association of Medical Recruiters of Australia and New Zealand. ‘A lot come out on the basis they’re not seeing opportunities they want in the UK and come out with the mindset of spending a few years for experience. However when they get here, they are generally becoming more Velcroed. There are no specific data, but anecdotally, we aren’t hearing of large numbers returning.’”

“Mr Bell’s assessment tallies with a study published in the British Medical Journal in January, investigating the number of UK doctors practising abroad, and how to attract them back. It found that only three in 10 UK-trained doctors who arrived in New Zealand had originally intended to emigrate permanently, but that number later rose to nine in 10. Doctors at all levels complain of an overly bureaucratic NHS where they lack control. Many report extensive ‘goodwill hours’ and coming in on days off, which would breach European Union working time regulations if recorded, and say only family and friends in the UK keep them from making a move abroad.”

It’s curious that there’s no mention of British doctors coming to the US. Perhaps they see ObamaCare as an American version of the British National Health Service. Why leave one socialist state that treats doctors like crap for another?

A nation should recognize the intelligence and talent that goes into someone becoming a doctor. It’s the height of government arrogance to dictate salaries and working hours to doctors while lawyers -for example- often make more money than doctors with few government restrictions on them while lawyers are parasites and doctors are valuable members of society.

Immigration Agents Sue the Government

Fox News reports: “Ten federal immigration agents have filed suit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano claiming recent directives are forcing them to break the law and ignore their duties when it comes to deporting illegal immigrants. The suit was filed Thursday in Texas federal court by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. It challenges recent directives allowing some illegal immigrants — particularly non-felons and those who came to the U.S. as children — to stay and, in some cases, get work permits.”


Barack Obama: Above the Law

In other words, arbitrary revocation of the law by the President of the United States without reference to Congress. It’s called tyranny and in a normal country would be an impeachable offense.
Fox News goes on: “The suit, obtained by Fox News, says the agents are being forced to violate federal law. It says the new directive unconstitutionally usurps and encroaches upon the legislative powers of Congress. ICE Director John Morton is also named as a defendant. Kris Kobach, lead attorney on the case, equated the move to give thousands of illegal immigrants a reprieve to the failed Fast and Furious gun-walking operation.”

“In both instances, the Obama administration ordered federal law enforcement agents to break the law, to ignore the laws that they’re supposed to enforce, and, in the case of the ICE agents, to actually break federal laws that say you’re supposed to deport certain people,’ he said. ‘and in each case, the Obama administration seems to be doing so for political reasons.’”

Unfortunately, there is no way to compel the United States government to obey US law aside from voting the two-party system out of power, which should have been done 80 years ago.

Barry Soetoro has discovered that he can disobey the law and rule by decree without Congress, and he gets away with it because no one has the spine to stand up to him and organize an impeachment. The Democrats are complicit in this tyranny and wouldn’t support an impeachment regardless of how guilty their man is, and the Republicans are too gutless to even try to start an impeachment.

We’ve got the same problem we had three generations ago, a hopelessly corrupt two-party system. Americans need to start voting for Third Party candidates to break this corrupt stalemate, but it looks like that won’t happen until our economy is completely destroyed, which shouldn’t be that long an additional wait.

Former Marine, Brandon Raub Released from Confinement for Exercising his Free Speech

by Jeff Davis

Some history buffs may be familiar with the old Soviet Union and their habit of throwing political dissidents into mental institutions. I’m sure most Americans would say “That could never happen here in the US.” Well, it has happened here in the US, and not just once.


Former Marine, Brandon Raub

An article on The Blaze reports “26-year-old former U.S. Marine Brandon Raub was released from a psychiatric facility via a judge’s order, who ruled that the government had no legal grounds to hold him.”

“…Raub’s lead attorney and president of the Rutherford Institute, gave his first interview following his client’s release to discuss the case.”

“Whitehead told Beck that he and his organization are planning to sue… ‘We are getting ready to file a civil lawsuit…because [Raub] has been put through hell for a week,’ said Whitehead….”

“On August 20, Raub was sentenced to up to 30 days in a psychiatric facility after he was detained by federal law enforcement on August 16 over some Facebook posts that criticized the U.S. government and questioned the official story behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks. He also referred to ‘starting a revolution.’”

“Whitehead said that veterans have since been contacting him from across the country claiming they too were victims of wrongful detention in psychiatric institutes like Raub. Apparently, there are civil commitment laws in other states as well, he said.”

“’It happens. There’s about 20,000 civil commitments alone in Virginia each year,’ he added.’

“It was actually Raub’s mother, who took to Facebook in a rage after he son was taken by federal and local law enforcement officers, that sounded the alarm and made the entire country aware of his situation.”

“’Did they have a warrant for his arrest?’ Beck asked.”

“’No warrant for his arrest and no search warrant,’ Whitehead replied. ‘They haven’t [charged him with a crime] and they’re not going to.’”

"Stunned, Beck asked how this could take place in the United States of America, where the Constitution provides protections from such things, most notably the First Amendment.’

“’Is this America,’ the attorney said. ‘That’s what I keep asking.’”

It should be noted that none of Brandon Raub’s posts were inciting violence and that it’s possible to have a peaceful revolution, much like the Tea Party is attempting at this time. Many supporters of Ron Paul called his last two presidential campaigns “The Ron Paul Revolution”.

The Don’t Tread On Me blog reports: “A judge today ordered the release of a Marine Corps veteran being detained as a psychiatric patient after concerns over his Facebook postings. After an hour-long hearing, Circuit Judge W. Allan Sharrett said an involuntary commitment petition issued against Brandon J. Raub was invalid because it contained no allegation or basis to holding him.”

“….Facebook postings by Raub generally involved impassioned pleas for a return to American ideals of freedom and independence but also speak of betrayal by elected leaders. ‘Your leaders are planning to merge the United States into a one-world banking system,’ he wrote. (Well, actually, they are, and they don’t make any particular secret of the fact.) ‘They want to put computer chips in you… these men have evil hearts. We gave them the keys to our country. We were not vigilant with our republic.’”

“Raub served in the Marines from 2005 until 2011 and was a combat engineer sergeant. He said he operates a home-based silver numismatic-coin business.”

It seems as though our government reacts especially harshly with dissidents who call for replacing the two party system and who demand a return to the silver standard. That combination of two things seems to put you at the top of their target list for some reason.

You really wonder sometimes how the secret police choose the people they victimize, since there are so many out there saying and posting the same things. Maybe it’s some kind of lottery. If so, Sergeant Raub was the unlucky “winner” of some special unlawful persecution at the hands of the Obama regime.

Govt. Buys More than 1.5 Billion Rounds of Ammunition for Federal Police Agencies

by Jeff Davis

Not long ago, a news story reported that the Department for Homeland Security bought 750 million hollow point .40 caliber pistol rounds. Well it turns out that was only half the total ammo purchased, and even smaller federal bureaucracies are arming their agents to the teeth.


Heavily armed FBI agents.

An article on Fox News reports: “Obscure federal agencies triggered a firestorm of conspiracy theories this week after they put out orders for thousands of rounds of deadly hollow-point bullets. But the agencies, most recently the Social Security Administration, are trying to put a damper on the speculation — noting the ammunition is standard issue and simply used for mandatory federal training sessions.”

“’Our special agents need to be armed and trained appropriately,’ said a message on the official blog for Social Security’s inspector general office explaining the purchases. The bullet purchases drew widespread attention as the website Infowars.com published several stories on them that were linked off the widely read Drudge Report and other sites. Infowars.com catalogued a string of recent purchases — first by the Department of Homeland Security, then by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and then the Social Security Administration. The Social Security Administration solicitation, posted Aug. 7 called for 174,000 rounds of .357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition.”

That’s a lot of “training” for bureaucrats who sit behind desks and computer terminals all day. Somebody in the federal government is tooling up for war, or “civil unrest” if you want to call it that, and they’re trying to disguise their ammunition purchases by billing them to ridiculous bogus end users like Social Security and the National Oceanographic Institute, who no doubt need hundreds of thousands of rounds of .357 hollow points to fight off sea monsters.

Why are they even bothering with this idiotic deception? Possibly it’s a budgetary thing; the seven national-level secret police agencies have run out of funds in their own budget and so they’re stealing money from other government departments. And who uses hollow points for training, anyway?

Another article reports “News reports indicating that multiple agencies of the federal government have ordered and are stockpiling multimillions of rounds of ammunition have pressured the Feds to offer an explanation. But the official explanation has only raised more questions.”

“On Friday the government stated that the hollow point bullets it has procured are ‘standard issue’ and that they are used to train security agents used by each of the various federal agencies.”

“…Maj. Gen. Curry confirmed these suspicions in his article for The Daily Caller… Curry stated,”

“‘Hollow point bullets are so lethal that the Geneva Convention does not allow their use on the battle field in time of war. Hollow point bullets don’t just stop or hurt people, they penetrate the body, spread out, fragment and cause maximum damage to the body’s organs. Death often follows.’”

“In addition, Curry noted that during the Iraq War the U.S. military used 70 million rounds of ammunition per year. Compare that with the 750 million rounds of hollow point bullets that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ordered in March. And then it further ordered another 750 million rounds of various types of ammunition, some of which can penetrate walls.”

So our government has ordered more than 1.5 billion rounds of ammunition with half of that hollow point ammunition for “routine target practice”.

That’s enough ammunition to shoot every American five times. Anyone who doesn’t get a little bit suspicious when confronted with information like that isn’t paying attention or is way too trusting.

White Nationalists Versus Diversity Commissars

by Jeff Davis

The average person active in the pro-White movement isn’t some muscle-bound thug with scary tattoos. The average pro-White activist would fit right in with a crowd of normal-looking White folks. His ultimate goal is to create an all-White homeland for his people by peacefully expelling the Third World invaders. He doesn’t want to harm the Third World people or enslave them or steal the natural resources in their homelands (which is more than I can say for the likes of the Bush presidents or Bill Clinton for that matter).



Most Third World people living in White nations have been allowed in by politicians with a sinister agenda to change our homelands into something unrecognizable against our will. Since White people were never allowed to vote on whether we wanted our homelands overwhelmed by a Third World invasion, we are completely justified in sending these invaders back to the countries, they came from.

In the United States in addition to recent Third World invaders, there are Indians and the descendants of Black slaves. The Indians have already been given reservations, and the descendants of Black slaves could be given their our country, possibly on territory along the Mexican border. All the other Third World invaders are relatively new arrivals, who have taken jobs and government resources from the native White people, that they had no right to take.

Now contrast this to what the “noble” Allied powers did to White people after World War Two. In Operation Keel Haul, the British, French and Americans rounded up eastern European refugees, who were not guilty of anything except fleeing the oppression of Communism and packed them on trains against their will for Communist-occupied Europe.

One article describes what happened to these people: “During World War II, some 2.5 million Soviet citizens found themselves in Germany and the occupied countries as prisoners of war, slave laborers, or refugees. From 1944 to 1947, these people were forcibly repatriated in a number of operations, the best known of which was Operation Keelhaul in 1946-7. Many committed suicide rather than return to Soviet slavery. Many others were dragged kicking and screaming into the trucks that took them out of Allied territory. The public, by and large, did not know of these atrocities; in fact, the operation was scaled down to some slight extent because Eisenhower and Montgomery threatened to divulge it to the public. The scaling down consisted in formally ‘screening’ the victims for politically persecuted ones. But in essence the politicians prevailed: the officers knew that they had to fulfill a certain quota or have the Soviet authorities (who were by then running the camps) step in. The ‘screening’ was merely a rationalization in making Britain and the US a party to the atrocity. Of the displaced persons thus forcibly returned to the Soviet union, MORE THAN 800,000 WERE SLAUGHTERED by Stalin’s regime. In the history of a weak, hypocritical and spineless West, Operation Keelhaul and allied operations stand out as most shameful examples.”

Whenever some modern-day Diversity commissar tries to lecture you about how “evil” it is for White people to want all-White, low-crime homelands to live in, remind them of what the “big-hearted” Allied victors of World War Two did to innocent White refugees after the war –slaughtering 800,000 innocent White people.

White Nationalists simply want to load up the swarms of Third World invaders on commercial jets and fly them back to their countries of origin. We’re not sending them back to certain death under a brutal dictator like Stalin, and if some Ugandan -for example- claims that he is a genuine political refugee in fear for his life, we’ll allow him to pick a different Third World nation for his expulsion. We’re not heartless murderers, like the post-war “democratic” Allied leaders. We simply want our White homelands restored to the happy, prosperous condition they enjoyed in the early 1960s before sinister forces changed our immigration policies without our consent.

America’s Longest War: All for Israel

The death of 21 year-old Pfc. Shane W. Cantu of Corunna, Michigan, announced last week by the Pentagon, marks the 2,114th American military death in what has become America’s longest war in history—all fought because of Jewish Supremacist control of the American government.


21 year-old Pfc. Shane W. Cantu

Pfc. Cantu, who died of shrapnel wounds in the remoteness of eastern Afghanistan, was just 10 years old when the war, which tragically ended his life, started.

The invasion of Afghanistan took place shortly after the attacks of September 11, 2001. The Zionist Supremacists and their running dogs such as George Bush Jr decided to blame Afghanistan for the attacks, even though they were carried out by Saudi and Egyptian individuals.

The invasion of Afghanistan had nothing to do with “liberating” that country, as the liars claimed (even calling the invasion “Operation Enduring Freedom”) but rather everything to do with using American lives, money and military might to attack and squash all those who posed even the slightest threat to the Zionist Supremacist state of Israel.

According to the independent monitoring organization, the National Priorities Project, which is directed at monitoring the impact of federal spending at the national, state, congressional district and local levels, the cost of the war in Afghanistan has been over $560,000,000,000 and still climbing.

The cost of the war in Iraq, another conflict fought exclusively to protect Israel, is in excess of $806,000,000,000 and also still climbing.

Tens of thousands of soldiers have been critically wounded in these wars as well, further adding to the misery and cost of these Jewish Supremacist-directed foreign misadventures.

The price which Americans have paid for Zionist Supremacist control of their government, media, and economy, has now been paid in blood as well.
Americans are quite literally, being killed for the Jewish Supremacists.

It’s “Normal” for Jews to Spit on Christians in Jerusalem, says Top Catholic

It is “normal” for Jews to spit on Christians in the streets of Jerusalem, a senior Catholic church leader in that city, Father Pierbattista Pizzaballa, custos (Latin for guardian ) of holy sites on behalf of the Vatican has said.


Quoted in an interview in the Haaretz newspaper after a new arson and vandalism attack on a Trappist Monastery in Latrun, upon which the words “Jesus was a monkey” was scrawled in Hebrew, Pizzaballa cautioned Israelis over how Christians are treated in Israel.

In a reference to the long-standing, continual incidents of Orthodox Jewish extremists in Jerusalem spitting at Christian clergy, Pizzaballa said: “When I came to the country, I was told that I should know that if I walk around with a frock in the city [of Jerusalem], people would spit on me, and I shouldn’t be offended, it’s normal.”

No matter how high his position, any priest who makes his way around the city will sooner or later be spat upon and cursed by a yeshiva student, he added.

Pizzaballa, who has been living in Israel for 22 years, is the head of the Franciscan order in the Middle East. As custos, he is one of the senior figures in the Catholic Church and has custody of most of the Christian holy sites in the country, including Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulcher, which Christians regard as the site of Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, and Bethelem’s Church of the Nativity.

After more than two decades here, he said he knows the areas of Jerusalem where he is at risk of being spat upon, including the area of Jaffa Gate and the Armenian Quarter.

This week’s vandalism at the Latrun monastery is the latest in a recent streak of attacks on Christian institutions.

In February, following incidents in Jerusalem, Pizzaballa wrote to President Shimon Peres that in recent years, he and his colleagues had learned to ignore provocations, but that now they were escalating to the point that they had become intolerable.

Following his letter to Peres, however, anti-Christian animosity even surfaced in the Knesset, after Christian bibles were sent to parliament members and National Union MK Michael Ben Ari ripped a copy of the New Testament in front of the camera.

“It was shocking,” said Pizzaballa. “If you as a Jew want people to respect you, you need to respect others. There are billions of Christians for whom this book is holy.”

He also took exception to what he said was the weak response by the political system and the public at large to Ben Ari’s act, saying it was limited to statements that Ben Ari didn’t need to do what he did. “It’s a lack of sensitivity,” said the cleric. “Such a serious thing occurs and no one does anything. In practice, it negates our existence here.”

Democrats Launch Racist Attacks on Black Republican

by Jeff Davis

The Palm Beach Post reports: “Conservative black U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Palm Beach Gardens, says an ad that depicts him punching white women plays on racial stereotypes and would make liberals apoplectic if a Republican ran it against a black Democrat.”


U.S. Rep. Allen West

“While Sarah Palin and Herman Cain joined the West campaign in ratcheting up criticism of the ad on Friday, an NAACP official said he didn’t find the 30-second spot to be racially offensive. And the campaign of West’s main Democratic rival defended the ad’s content while denying any involvement in its creation.”

“The controversy centers on an ad by American Sunrise, a PAC that is largely financed by the father of Democratic congressional candidate Patrick Murphy. The ad blasts West’s stances on seniors, women’s health and tax issues by showing a cartoonish likeness of West in boxing gloves slugging an elderly woman and a younger woman who are white and punching a black family and grabbing the family’s cash.”

Now if anyone, I repeat ANYONE on the Right did a similar stereotype of a Black Democrat candidate even as a joke, there would be howls of outrage and screams of “racism”, but apparently Democrats and their super-PACs can make ads like this and it’s “no big deal”.

The article notes “’Think if the Republican Party or some conservative PAC ran a picture of a black Democrat politician or congressman punching white women and white seniors. I’m sure that MSNBC, NBC and the Huffington Post and everyone would be going apoplectic right now,’ West said on Fox News.”

If a similar ad had targeted a Black Democrat or -horrors- Obama himself, the media would be inciting people to riot in the streets outside the Super-PAC’s office and a full team of FBI agents including SWAT and dog teams would be dispatched to investigate the ad as a civil rights violation or maybe even domestic terrorism.

The article goes on “West, one of only two black Republicans in Congress, said different rules apply to black conservatives.”

“’You know, where’s the outrage from Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and the NAACP about this? They’re not going to say anything because they’re nothing but an effective wing of the Democrat Party whatsoever and they have effectively kept them well placed so that they can continue to have a black electorate voting bloc,’ West said.”

Limbaugh and the kosher conservatives have a point: Democrats will do or say anything, anything at all, in order to hang on to their power and that includes racist attacks on Republican Blacks or sexist attacks on Republican women. For them, apparently none of the rules apply.

The controversial ad can be seen here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSke77t5xCw

British Politicians: Hebrew Lessons Allowed, but Cut Everything Else

by Ian Mosley

The Daily Mail (U.K.) reports: “A Tory MP was under fire last night for charging taxpayers for lessons he took to learn his partner’s language. Nick Boles has spent £678.80 on studying Hebrew after entering into a civil partnership with Shay Meshulam last year. Mr Boles, who has called for pensioners to be stripped of free prescriptions, winter fuel payments and bus passes, claims he is ‘entitled’ to learn the ancient Jewish language."



“The Grantham MP met Mr Meshulam on a Conservative Friends of Israel trip and they had a civil ceremony last March. He is not the first MP to put language lessons on expenses. Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt charged taxpayers over £3,000 to learn Mandarin after marrying a Chinese woman.”

Egads, buggery and race-mixing!! Why couldn’t these individuals just get their “partners” to teach them by speaking the language at home? Or here’s a thought: Since both of these couples will be living in England, why not have everyone speak English? Or is that just too “racist”?

The article goes on “The pair are among nine MPs who got free classes in the last financial year. Mr Boles said: ‘Language instruction is a service available to Members of Parliament. I took some Hebrew lessons. It is something I’m entitled to do.’”

“Mr Boles is tipped by some party insiders for promotion, but his expenses claim could prove embarrassing. Matthew Sinclair, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘Nick Boles has abused this taxpayer-funded perk in order to make conversation around the breakfast table a little easier.’ If MPs want to learn the language of a foreign partner then they should pay for it themselves, not expect taxpayers to pick up the bill.”

A poofter politician in England is part of the protected class. Don’t expect any of them to be punished for any minor (or even major) wrong-doings until after a pro-White political movement forms up and takes control of the country away from the anti-White coalition that is currently working toward the destruction of the native White population.

White Men Sexually Harassed in the Obama Regime: The Case of James T. Hayes Jr.

by Jeff Davis

The New York Post reports: “A veteran US law-enforcement official has filed a blockbuster discrimination lawsuit against Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, charging she pushed him aside to make way for a less-qualified woman who’s ‘enjoyed a long-standing relationship’ with the anti-terror chief.”


James T. Hayes Jr.

“That woman, Dora Schriro, identifed in court papers and first reported by blogger Debbie Schlussel, was later appointed by Mayor Bloomberg as commissioner of the city Department of Correction, a post she still holds.”

“The court papers also allege that Suzanne Barr, Napolitano’s chief of staff at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has engaged in numerous acts of sexually offensive behavior intended to humiliate and intimidate male employees. Barr’s alleged acts include calling one man “in his hotel room and screaming at him that she wanted [to have sex with him in crudely explicit language].”

Didn’t we just spend the last 40 years going on about how evil it was when male bosses sexually harassed their female employees? Frankly, I suspect that “the bad male manager” stereotype was considerably exaggerated by Hollywood. Most White men have a sense of honor, and even the ones, who don’t, usually have enough brains not to do things that will get them fired.

Apparently in the liberal world, a whole different set of rules apply. Bill Clinton could grope women or philander with interns to his heart’s content, and some liberal women in positions of power are not much better than old Slick Willie.

The article notes “The suit was filed by James T. Hayes Jr., special agent in charge of New York City investigations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.”

“Hayes, who began his career with the feds as a border patrol agent in 1995, formerly served as director of ICE Detention and Removal Operations in Washington, DC, where he oversaw about 8,500 workers and a $2.5 billion budget.”

“But Hayes says he was demoted following President Obama’s election and the appointment of Napolitano, a former Arizona governor, to head the Department of Homeland Security. In court papers filed in Washington federal court, Hayes says Schriro — who previously served as director of the Arizona Department of Corrections under Napolitano — was named a special adviser to Napolitano on detention and removal operations in February 2009 and began to replace him at DHS and ICE meetings. ‘Schriro was not as qualified for the position plaintiff had because of lack of federal law-enforcement experience,’ Hayes’ suit says. ‘Schriro did have experience, however, working with Secretary Napolitano. Schriro enjoyed a long-standing relationship with the secretary.’”

The suit doesn’t detail the nature of their relationship. With the Obama regime, probably anything goes sexually.

The article goes on “During her 2002 gubernatorial campaign, Napolitano publicly denied rumors that she’s a lesbian. In a 2009 interview, she said, ‘I just happen not to be married.’ When asked at that time if she was ‘seeing anybody now,’ she answered, ‘Yes, my staff.’”

“Hayes’ suit says that when it became clear he was going to be removed from his post, he felt that he was being targeted because of his gender. He charges that in April and May 2009, ICE chief of staff Barr removed the entire contents of the offices of three male employees, including nameplates, computers and telephones, to the men’s bathroom at ICE headquarters. ‘Barr also created a frat-house type atmosphere that is targeted to humiliate and intimidate male employees,’ court papers say.”

“In addition to the alleged hotel phone call, Barr allegedly covertly took an ICE BlackBerry device assigned to a male special agent in charge and sent a BlackBerry Messenger message to his female supervisor indicating that the male employee had a crush on the female supervisor and fantasized about her. Further, Barr promoted and otherwise rewarded those male employees who play along with her sexually charged games, the suit says.”

I have no doubt that all of the charges made by Mr. Hayes are true and an article in USA Today seems to support this, reporting: “Suzanne Barr, the agency’s chief of staff, called the allegations unfounded in a resignation letter to ICE Director John Morton, but said she wants to avoid distractions for the agency. Barr is a political appointee of President Obama and a long-time aide to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. The complaints against Barr are included in a sexual discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed by a senior ICE agent in May.”

Obviously, this was one of those “resign now or be fired” situations. The evidence apparently was a little too overwhelming, and the Obama regime wants to minimize the effects of this scandal during an election year which involves someone, whom Obama chose himself, to put in a position of authority.

A Wall Street Journal article reports “A federal lawsuit (in which) Hayes described what he called a ‘frat house’ atmosphere designed to humiliate male employees under former Immigration and Customs Chief of Staff Suzanne Barr (is being mediated out of court). At least two other male employees have since made similar allegations against Barr. Fischer said Hayes and the Justice Department agreed to mediate the case. Hayes is seeking more than $4 million for sexual discrimination and retaliation.”

It’s a safe bet Hayes and the other victims will be generously paid off in the out of court mediation to avoid any further bad publicity for the Obama regime. The fact that Ms. Barr resigned is effectively an admission of guilt by the government despite her vapid attempts to claim she did nothing wrong.

The Democrat Party has been waging war against decent patriotic White men for generations. I’m sure arrogant leftists do everything they can to belittle and demean any normal White men, who are placed under their control. If they would treat someone like Mr. Hayes, who had been running a multi-billion dollar operation, this badly, how do you think White men on the lower rungs of the government are treated, assuming they are allowed to keep their jobs at all?!!

Obama’s Immigration Policy: Don’t Deport Any of them

by Jeff Davis

Remember the old television ads about the Maytag repairman who had nothing to do? That’s what America’s immigration enforcement agents must feel like these days, except that there is work for them, but they’re not allowed to do it.


Fox News Radio reports: “Morale among Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents is at an all-time low more than a month after the Obama administration announced major changes to the nation’s immigration enforcement policy, according to the head of a national agency representing thousands of agents. ‘Morale is in the toilet right now,’ said Chris Crane, president of the National ICE Council. ‘Most of the guys out in the field are just in an uproar.’”

Understandable, since the president of the United States has just ordered them to sit on their hands and stop doing their job, and let the brown tide of future Democrat voters simply flood in.
Fox News Radio continues: “President Obama’s policy allows the federal government to use ‘prosecutorial discretion’ to allow younger illegal immigrants to stay in the country and get work permits. Critics called it backdoor amnesty, but the administration said it stops short of granting illegals citizenship.”

That would be a little hard even for Obama to do simply with a stroke of his pen with one of those Executive Orders, that somehow bypasses the Constitutional process of making or changing the law, but nobody seems to care or object except folks like us.

The article notes “’They call it discretion but it’s not our discretion,’ Crane told Fox News. ‘We have no discretion.’”

“Crane said a case involving a veteran ICE agent is a perfect illustration. The agent arrested an illegal who was not a ‘primary target.’ The agent’s superior officers ordered the illegal released – even though he did not meet the criteria listed by the Dept. of Homeland Security. The officer refused to follow orders and is now facing a three day suspension. The 35-year-old illegal immigrant with ten traffic violations was released.”

Ten traffic violations! How many of those were DUIs? Apparently Obama doesn’t care if US citizens get killed by reckless or drunk illegal alien drivers!
Fox News Radio goes on: “He pointed to another case in El Paso where an illegal immigrant injured an ICE agent during an attempted escape. Again, Crane said, because the individual was not a priority target, he was released without any charges being filed.”

Including no assault charges on a law officer? I suppose that might possibly lower their morale.

The only reason we have immigration agents at all is to maintain a facade that we’re trying to control the border. We’ve had a series of presidents, who sold us out, including George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. It remains to be seen if the Tea Party can arm-twist Romney into restoring any semblance of immigration enforcement assuming we can defeat Obama before he does any more damage.